Back to case studies
Insurance

Agentic AI inboxfor claims

An Agentic AI Inbox for Insurance Claims Intake

The result

30h → 30m

of weekly claims email work, from three people to one

An agentic inbox reads every claims email as it lands, writes complete submissions into the CRM, and escalates only what it cannot finish to one person.

The agentic claims inboxFlowchart: claims email arriving in Outlook and Gmail is read by an extraction agent. If every field is present, the client gets an automatic reply and the claim record is written to the CRM. If a field is missing, the case is flagged to a human reviewer, who approves a drafted chase email; the agent then watches the thread and re-runs extraction when the client replies.COMPLETEINCOMPLETECLIENT REPLIESINBOXClaims mailboxmonitored 24/7AGENTExtraction agentbody · PDF · DOCXCLAIMANTPOLICY NUMBERDATE OF LOSSPERILLOSS VALUENOT FOUNDAll fieldspresent?AUTOClient gets a replyin seconds, any hourWritten to the CRMsource email attachedHUMANFlagged for review1 person · 30 min a weekOUTBOUNDChase draftedsent once approved,thread then watchedLEGENDAgent stepDecisionHuman gateWatch loop
How it runs

Mail in, record out — and a person involved only where the agent could not finish the job on its own.

Measured
60x
less human time on claims email each week: 30 hours across three people, down to 30 minutes for one
168
hours a week the intake desk is open, up from 40 — no rota, no annual leave, no handoff
1
person now runs claims intake end to end, working only what the agent flags
What changed

The work did not get faster. It stopped being work.

Before

30h

Three people, two hours each, every working day — opening claims email and re-keying it into the CRM.

Human hours a week · 1 cell = 1 hour

Cover · open 40 hours of 168

After

30m

One person, once a week, working only the cases the agent could not close on its own.

Human hours a week · 1 cell = 1 hour

Cover · open 168 hours of 168

01

The Challenge

Three people spent two hours each, every working day, doing the same thing: opening claims email and re-typing it into the CRM.

Submissions arrived as plain text, scanned PDFs and Word attachments. Every field the CRM wanted — claimant, policy number, date of loss, peril, loss value — was read off one screen and keyed into another. Cover ran on a rota, so a claim that landed on Friday evening waited until Monday, and a week of annual leave left a queue for someone else to inherit cold.

The inbox itself became the system: an agent reads every claim as it lands, and a person is involved only where the agent could not finish the job.

02

The Solution

The agent watches the carrier's Outlook and Gmail claims mailboxes, opens each message and its attachments, and extracts the fields the CRM requires. When it has all of them, it replies to the claimant confirming receipt and writes the record to the CRM with the source email attached.

03

When Something Is Missing

An incomplete submission is not a failure state. It is the other half of the workflow.

  • The case is held out of the CRM and flagged to the reviewer, showing the source email beside the fields the agent could not find.
  • A chase email to the client is drafted for that reviewer to approve, naming exactly what is outstanding.
  • The agent stays on the thread. When the client replies, extraction runs again on the new message.
  • Once the record is complete it is written to the CRM the same way an automatic one is.
04

Always Open

The desk went from open 40 hours a week to open 168.

A claim that arrives at 2am on a Sunday is acknowledged at 2am on a Sunday. There is no rota to cover, no out-of-office to route around and no handoff notes to write, because nothing sits in a queue waiting for one particular person to come back.

05

Results

  • 30 hours a week of claims email across three people, down to 30 minutes a week for one
  • Acknowledgement to the claimant went from next business day to seconds, at any hour
  • One reviewer runs the whole intake desk, working only the flagged remainder
  • Every automatic write carries its source email, so any field can be traced back
06

Technology

  • Outlook and Gmail mailbox monitoring, with attachment and OCR handling
  • Field extraction tuned to the carrier's own claims documents and terminology
  • CRM API writes with source-document audit metadata
  • Reviewer queue showing the source email side by side with the extracted fields
  • Thread-level reply tracking, so a chased claim resolves itself
Calculate your ROI

Your Agentic AI inbox for claims projection.

Hours reclaimed per week
56
Projected annual savings
$167,500

Projection uses the same reduction coefficient measured in the case study above, applied to your inputs across 50 working weeks per year. Results are indicative; real scope is defined during discovery.

Work with us

Book a call.We'll come back with specifics.

Start with the map of your organization, or with the one job that hurts. Measured in hours and money, and everything we build stays yours.

Loading form…